It is no easy task to choose the theme of a magazine’s first
edition. However, the most challenging issue won our interest with
almost no competition. The post-9/11 era provided the world with
a two-fold challenge. First, the clash within the Islamic world
between the radical fundamentalists and “the new reformers
of Islam” is rightly characterized by the French author and
founder of Le Nouvel Observateur Jean Daniel as “a gigantic
speed competition.” The winner could make all the difference
for the future of mankind.
Second, Western countries’ answer to this clash proved they
were not prepared. More than anything, democracy means moderation.
To quote Daniel again: “In the world ignited by unrest, crusades
and fanaticism, the success of moderation and reason is not guaranteed.”
To make things worse, pessimism surrounding the Middle East’s
capacity for democracy has been around for a long time. While somewhat
discredited today, this thinking still proves very much alive.
Philosophically speaking, we are back to Max Weber’s “polytheism
of values.” Any “clash of civilizations,” any
religious war, means, as Olivier Tinland states, “the impossibility
to define, in a rational way, a place of understanding that permits
harmonizing the axiological preferences of individuals or human
groups.” Practically speaking, the question that remains unanswered
is how to convince others to adhere to “ultimate values that
structure the life of a community.”
Different cultures, different mentalities, but the same incapacity
to always deal peacefully with differences. We are often lost in
a huge labyrinth whose walls of misconceptions and intolerance become
stronger and stronger. But, the poet is right: “There is a
crack in everything./That’s how the light gets in.”
Mutual goodwill can spot these cracks, work into them and one day
a door could open. Trustworthy hosts and equally trustworthy guests
can and must make the difference.
Opening the door to mutual trust involves caution. It is a continuous,
even tenuous, process, not a spectacular, one-time event. It should
not matter how slowly we find the answers to our fundamental fears
for any answer is better than any Armageddon-like scenario. |
|
|